| NO. 33261 |
|
| Name |
Katherine_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-02 20:27:16 |
| I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33262 |
|
| Name |
Madelyn_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-02 04:48:57 |
| Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33263 |
|
| Name |
Khloe_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-01 15:51:15 |
| I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33264 |
|
| Name |
Mia_fromUS |
Date: 2011-09-30 20:30:35 |
| I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33265 |
|
| Name |
Molly_fromUS |
Date: 2011-09-30 01:46:00 |
| I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
