|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| NO. 33251 |
|
| Name |
bentpress |
Date: 2011-10-05 21:03:30 |
| rarpro.net âûäàþùèéñÿ ñàéò ñîâðåìåííîñòè,çíàêîìñò,dating |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33252 |
|
| Name |
Morgan_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-05 14:28:41 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33253 |
|
| Name |
Rolitaits |
Date: 2011-10-05 10:29:26 |
| Guy .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds alsoI'm glad to seek out numerous helpful info here in the publish, we need work out extra techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . . |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33254 |
|
| Name |
Angelina_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-04 19:30:48 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 33255 |
|
| Name |
Sawastoft |
Date: 2011-10-04 12:48:54 |
|
|
| ↑TOP |
|
|
|
|
|
