|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| NO. 32896 |
|
| Name |
Jeloheelavy |
Date: 2012-01-09 00:42:07 |
Сегодня, Приветствуем всех игроков в покер! Наш сайт занимается майнингом турниров покера в сети PokerStars. Сбор историй рук турниров является сложной задачей, требующей значительных затрат ресурсов и постоянной адаптации програмного обеспечения. На данный момент большинство сайтов майнеров либо вообще не предоставляют handhistory турниров, либо предлагают старые данный по высокой цене (ПТР). Мы благополучно справляемся с данной задачей. Предлагаем заказать месячную подписку на актуальные истории рук турниров почти всех типов. Контакты: www.hhtourney.com skype: hhtourney mail: support@hhtourney.com
|
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32897 |
|
| Name |
Trinity_Florida |
Date: 2012-01-09 00:30:37 |
| That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*) |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32898 |
|
| Name |
Emma_Delaware |
Date: 2012-01-08 19:13:25 |
| It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :) |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32899 |
|
| Name |
Molly_Colorado |
Date: 2012-01-08 16:24:30 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32900 |
|
| Name |
Anna_Pennsylvania |
Date: 2012-01-08 11:46:44 |
| Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
|
|
|
|
