| NO. 32721 |
|
| Name |
Rachel_South_Dakota |
Date: 2012-01-22 10:19:21 |
| Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32722 |
|
| Name |
Abigail_South_Dakota |
Date: 2012-01-22 09:06:19 |
| I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32723 |
|
| Name |
Aubrey_Iowa |
Date: 2012-01-22 07:23:46 |
| I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32724 |
|
| Name |
Alyssa_Virginia |
Date: 2012-01-22 06:05:32 |
| I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32725 |
|
| Name |
Sydney_Nevada |
Date: 2012-01-22 05:38:08 |
| Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
