| NO. 32671 |
|
| Name |
Arianna_Minnesota |
Date: 2012-02-04 04:15:32 |
| ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32672 |
|
| Name |
Savannah_Wisconsin |
Date: 2012-02-04 03:35:21 |
| That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*) |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32673 |
|
| Name |
Angelina_Maryland |
Date: 2012-02-04 02:59:25 |
| Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32674 |
|
| Name |
Sophie_Kansas |
Date: 2012-02-04 02:47:56 |
| Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32675 |
|
| Name |
Lauren_Ohio |
Date: 2012-02-04 02:29:13 |
| Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn’t even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
