| NO. 32641 |
|
| Name |
Stella_Texas |
Date: 2012-02-07 04:27:41 |
| I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32642 |
|
| Name |
Sophie_Delaware |
Date: 2012-02-07 03:59:10 |
| It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :) |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32643 |
|
| Name |
Brooklyn_Idaho |
Date: 2012-02-07 03:26:28 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32644 |
|
| Name |
Amelia_Georgia |
Date: 2012-02-07 03:02:24 |
| Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn’t even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32645 |
|
| Name |
Zoey_New_Mexico |
Date: 2012-02-07 02:16:45 |
| I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
