| NO. 32591 |
|
| Name |
Payton_Missouri |
Date: 2012-02-08 03:42:58 |
| It’s entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32592 |
|
| Name |
Brooklyn_Indiana |
Date: 2012-02-08 02:58:49 |
| I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32593 |
|
| Name |
Lillian_Connecticut |
Date: 2012-02-08 02:22:16 |
| Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn’t even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32594 |
|
| Name |
Kayla_Connecticut |
Date: 2012-02-08 02:07:40 |
| I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32595 |
|
| Name |
Genesis_Kentucky |
Date: 2012-02-08 01:48:48 |
| That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
