| NO. 32506 |
|
| Name |
Savannah_Ohio |
Date: 2012-02-09 17:11:27 |
| Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32507 |
|
| Name |
Kimberly_New_Hampshi |
Date: 2012-02-09 16:47:51 |
| It’s entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32508 |
|
| Name |
Valeria_Mississippi |
Date: 2012-02-09 16:01:22 |
| I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32509 |
|
| Name |
Destiny_Kansas |
Date: 2012-02-09 15:24:31 |
| I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 32510 |
|
| Name |
Ariana_Missouri |
Date: 2012-02-09 15:12:19 |
| I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
