| NO. 29741 |
|
| Name |
Jasmine_froumUZ |
Date: 2011-08-30 09:31:44 |
| One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out. |
 |
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 29742 |
|
| Name |
Madison_froumUZ |
Date: 2011-08-29 11:39:22 |
| What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was “only reading a WSJ article” on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 29743 |
|
| Name |
Aaliyah_froumUZ |
Date: 2011-08-28 17:26:46 |
| In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.? |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 29744 |
|
| Name |
AlishKrisa |
Date: 2011-08-27 15:21:28 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
| NO. 29745 |
|
| Name |
Abduvali |
Date: 2011-08-26 11:52:16 |
| I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating. |
|
| ↑TOP |
|
