NO. 29701 |
|
Name |
Autumn_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-03 10:11:18 |
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise. |
 |
↑TOP |
|
NO. 29702 |
|
Name |
Katherine_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-02 20:27:16 |
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts. |
 |
↑TOP |
|
NO. 29703 |
|
Name |
Madelyn_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-02 04:48:57 |
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought. |
 |
↑TOP |
|
NO. 29704 |
|
Name |
Khloe_fromUS |
Date: 2011-10-01 15:51:15 |
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too. |
 |
↑TOP |
|
NO. 29705 |
|
Name |
Mia_fromUS |
Date: 2011-09-30 20:30:35 |
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness. |
 |
↑TOP |
|